Senegal's walk-off sparked one of African football's most chaotic finals. Now, months later, the chaos has a new chapter.
The Senegalese Football Federation has vowed to take the matter to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. And honestly, you can understand why they are furious, because this whole situation is a mess of CAF's own making.
Let's start from the beginning, though, because the final itself deserves to be told properly before we get into the boardroom drama.
What Actually Happened in the Final
The match was played on 18 January in Morocco, and for large parts of it, nothing happened. It was tight, tense, and goalless heading into stoppage time. Then everything went sideways.
In the eighth minute of added time, referee Jean Jacques Ndala pointed to the spot. He had been sent to the pitchside monitor by VAR to review a challenge by Senegal defender El Hadji Malick Diouf on Brahim Diaz. After watching it back, Ndala gave the penalty.
That call came just moments after Ndala had also ruled out what Senegal head coach Pape Thiaw believed was a perfectly good Ismaila Sarr goal. Thiaw had already been stewing. The penalty decision pushed him over the edge.
He walked onto the pitch and ushered his players off the field.
All of them, except one. Sadio Mane, the former Liverpool striker and one of the most decorated players in African football, stayed put. He tried to wave his teammates back, tried to talk sense into people in the middle of what was turning into a full-blown crisis. It did not work, at least not straight away.
For 17 minutes, the stadium was in limbo. Morocco were ready to play. Senegal were not on the pitch.
FIFA president Gianni Infantino had already seen enough, posting on Instagram to condemn what he called "ugly scenes." Morocco coach Walid Regragui was livid at his post-match presser, calling Senegal's actions "shameful" and saying it did not "honour Africa."
Eventually, Senegal came back out. Real Madrid's Diaz stepped up to take the penalty, attempted a Panenka, and goalkeeper Edouard Mendy barely had to move to catch it. It was one of the most poorly executed penalties you will see at a major final. Ndala immediately blew his whistle for full-time. After all of that chaos, after 17 minutes of madness, the match went to extra time still goalless.
Then Villarreal midfielder Pape Gueye put Senegal ahead in the fourth minute of extra time, and that was that. 1-0 to Senegal. A second AFCON title in five years. Players were celebrating, medals were handed out, a bus parade was organised back home.
Thiaw, to his credit, did eventually acknowledge in a later interview that he should not have pulled his players off the pitch and that he had acted "in the heat of the moment." That honesty matters. It does not fully excuse it, but it matters.
CAF's Ruling
Fast forward to now, and CAF's appeal board has sided with Morocco's Football Federation, who appealed the result citing the competition's own regulations.
CAF issued a statement saying Senegal had been "declared to have forfeited the final match," with the result being recorded as 3-0 in Morocco's favour. The ruling was based on Articles 82 and 84 of AFCON regulations.
Article 82 is clear: if a team refuses to play or leaves the field before the end of regulation time without the referee's permission, they are considered the loser and eliminated. Article 84 kicks in on top of that, stating the team that breaks Article 82 will lose the match 3-0 and be permanently eliminated from the competition.
Morocco's federation was careful to frame their appeal in neutral terms. They said it was "never intended to challenge the sporting performance of the teams" but simply a request for the rules to be applied. The statement praised all participating nations and called the tournament "a major moment for African football."
That is a very diplomatic way of saying: we lost on the pitch, so we went to the rulebook.
Why This Decision Is Wrong
Here is where this gets uncomfortable, because the rules are clear, yes, but applying them in this situation is still the wrong call. And it needs to be said plainly.
Senegal did walk off. That was wrong. Thiaw has admitted as much. But here is the thing: they came back. They played the rest of the match. They played extra time. They conceded a penalty, had it saved, then went and scored a winner in extra time through legitimate play. The match, from the moment the players returned to the pitch, was contested properly. Senegal did not win because they walked off. They won because Gueye scored a goal.
Applying a 3-0 forfeit ruling to a match that was actually completed, in full, to its natural conclusion, with a goal and a result, stretches the logic of that regulation far beyond its reasonable intent. Article 82 exists to deal with situations where a match is abandoned because a team refuses to continue. That is not what happened here. Senegal returned. The game was finished. A winner was decided on the pitch, by the players, through football.
There is also something deeply awkward about the timeline here. The celebrations happened. The trophy was lifted. The medals were given out. Players went home and had parades.
Ismaila Sarr posted laughing emojis on Instagram when the ruling came out, which tells you exactly how absurd the whole thing feels to the Senegalese camp. El Hadji Malick Diouf was posting celebration photos captioned "Champions, speak up!" even after the ruling dropped. These players know they won that final. The reversal cannot change what they experienced.
Journalist Maher Mezahi put it well when speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live. He said the decision would not erase the emotional truth of what happened. "We cannot erase the final 16 minutes of that match and what we saw," he said. "We cannot erase the feelings of seeing Senegal lift the trophy and the players going home with the medal and them having a parade."
He is right. You cannot administratively undo lived experience.
CAF's problem here is not the rulebook. The rules are what they are. The problem is the precedent this sets and the message it sends. African football has spent years trying to build credibility, grow its global audience, and be taken seriously as a major tournament. Overturning a completed final months after the fact, based on a walk-off that lasted 17 minutes before the players returned and played out the game, is not going to help that cause. It makes the whole thing look unstable and arbitrary.
If CAF wanted to punish Senegal for the walk-off, there were other routes. A fine. A points deduction in a future competition. Sanctions against the coaching staff. Suspensions. These are the kinds of proportionate responses that address the misconduct without ripping the result of a completed football match out of the record books.
Instead, they handed Morocco a trophy they did not win on the pitch. Morocco know it. Senegal know it. Everyone watching knows it.
What Happens Next
The Senegalese Football Federation has confirmed it will appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, calling the ruling "unfair, unprecedented and unacceptable" and saying it brings "discredit to African football." CAS tends to move slowly, so this could drag on for months.
Meanwhile, Morocco have had their own turbulence to deal with. Regragui, the coach who was so vocal in the immediate aftermath of the final, was parted ways with on 5 March, just four months before Morocco are set to participate in the World Cup. That is a significant call to make this close to a major tournament, and it adds another layer of instability to a federation that is now holding an AFCON title it received through an appeal rather than a final whistle.
There are no clean endings here. Senegal's walk-off was wrong and Thiaw knows it. But the punishment handed down by CAF is disproportionate, poorly timed, and sets a troubling precedent for how African football handles its biggest moments.
The trophy says Morocco. The football said Senegal. African football deserved better than this outcome from either side.
0 Comments